User Tools

Site Tools


lawsuit

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
lawsuit [2025/12/14 17:33] lwattsiilawsuit [2025/12/14 18:34] (current) – [Defendants (recommended)] lwattsii
Line 1: Line 1:
-Where you are right now (clear state)+===== Where you are right now (clear state) =====
  
   * CNA has not accepted or denied the claim   * CNA has not accepted or denied the claim
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
-===== **Step 2** — File a protective lawsuit (even if narrow) =====+===== Step 2 — File a protective lawsuit (even if narrow) =====
  
   * This is not escalation — it’s preservation.   * This is not escalation — it’s preservation.
Line 31: Line 31:
 But you cannot fix a missed deadline. But you cannot fix a missed deadline.
  
-===== **Step 3** — Venue & parties (clean approach) =====+===== Step 3 — Venue & parties (clean approach) =====
  
 Venue Venue
  
 Harrison County, Texas – District Court Harrison County, Texas – District Court
 +  * **Chad Sims  - Judge**
  
 Yes, even though the City is involved. Yes, even though the City is involved.
Line 41: Line 42:
 Courts handle this all the time. Courts handle this all the time.
  
 +✅ Harrison County, Texas
 +  * Joe Black - Judge
 +This is not optional — it is correct and defensible.
 +
 +  * Property is located there
 +  * Damages occurred there
 +  * Defendants conducted business there
 +  * Evidence and witnesses are there
 +
 +Now the court level decision:
 +
 +
 +
 +🏛️ District Court (recommended)
 +
 +Harrison County District Court
 +
 +Why District Court (not JP / County):
 +
 +  * Your damages exceed $250,000 potential exposure when properly pled
 +  * Bad faith & Insurance Code claims belong here
 +  * City + insurer + contractor together belongs here
 +  * District Court avoids artificial damage caps and procedural traps
 +
 +This also signals seriousness to CNA and future counsel.
 +
 +✅ Decision:
 +Harrison County District Court
  
 ===== Defendants (recommended) ===== ===== Defendants (recommended) =====
Line 47: Line 76:
   * Continental Casualty Company (CNA) (for bad faith / unfair claims handling)   * Continental Casualty Company (CNA) (for bad faith / unfair claims handling)
   * City of Marshall, Texas (for property damage under TTCA)   * City of Marshall, Texas (for property damage under TTCA)
-  *** Insurance Agency?**+  *** Insurance Agency?** Bockman Agency?
  
 You can always nonsuit or sever later if needed. You can always nonsuit or sever later if needed.
Line 57: Line 86:
 Minimum viable filing: Minimum viable filing:
  
 +Casey Slone Construction LLC Direct tortfeasor
   * Negligence / property damage (construction activity causing flooding, sewer damage, structural harm)   * Negligence / property damage (construction activity causing flooding, sewer damage, structural harm)
   * Negligent failure to protect adjoining property   * Negligent failure to protect adjoining property
   * Texas Insurance Code §541.060 violations (delay, misrepresentation, failure to settle when liability reasonably clear)   * Texas Insurance Code §541.060 violations (delay, misrepresentation, failure to settle when liability reasonably clear)
 +  * Trespass / nuisance (optional)
   * Declaratory relief (optional, but useful)   * Declaratory relief (optional, but useful)
 +
 +Continental Casualty Company (CNA) Role: Bad faith & statutory violations
 +
 +Claims:
 +
 +  * Texas Insurance Code §541.060
 +  * Failure to attempt prompt, fair settlement
 +  * Misrepresentation of coverage position
 +  * Unreasonable delay
 +  * Suppression of engineer reports
 +  * Refusal to acknowledge or investigate the initial claim.
 +
 +You have extraordinary documentation for this.
 +
 +City of Marshall, Texas Role: Co-causing entity & TTCA liability
 +Claims:
 +
 +  * Property damage caused by governmental function
 +  * Negligent supervision
 +  * Negligent failure to protect adjoining property
 +
 +⚠️ Important:
 +We plead only property damage, not discretionary acts.
 +This avoids immunity dismissal.
 +
  
 That’s enough to stop the clock. That’s enough to stop the clock.
Line 112: Line 168:
 That’s the only leverage they have left. That’s the only leverage they have left.
  
 +===== If you want, next I can: =====
 +
 +  * Draft a bare-bones petition outline you can file pro se
 +  * Help you choose District vs County court
 +  * Map exact filing language to avoid immunity traps
 +  * Or help you identify Texas firms that step in after filing
  
 +But from here forward, the direction is set.
  
lawsuit.1765733615.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/12/14 17:33 by lwattsii